Wednesday, November 18, 2015

Are You Foreskin Or Against Skin

.
Hello, dear readers. I felt as if I should illustrate this post and grab your attention with a hint of what's, ahem, to come, so here, enjoy these pictures of the actor Gregg Sulkin in the latest issue of Flaunt magazine.  (Bless Flaunt magazine.)

These things aren't directly related, save in essence - I just have the feeling that among MNPP's readership there are a few people that appreciate the penis. Call me crazy; it's just a hunch. Well some friends of mine happen to be working on a thing relevant to your interests! It's a documentary called Pigs Without Blankets and it's on the subject of so-called "Intactivists" (stellar word), aka people fighting against male circumcision. I don't know, it seems to have worked out perfectly fine for Gregg Sulkin, but we'll see. Anyway they're looking for the last bit of funding on Kickstarter, which is where I am sending you guys today. Head over, hear their pitch - here's the video:
 .
.
And after the jump more of Sulkin making his own case...


20 comments:

Anonymous said...

This guy used to n-word on his instagram and creeped on an underage girl for years. Not that you care about racism when it comes to lusting after white peen, but I just thought you should know.

Anonymous said...

Who cares?

Anonymous said...

I mean, I feel like most people with integrity would care that some stupid white boy used the n-word for shits and giggles, but I shouldn't be surprised that readers of this 'blog' don't give a shit. Especially if it's a stupid white boy with abs.

Have fun.

Peggy Sue said...

I got the feeling that you cut a lot of extra foreskin in America in comparison to what we do in Europe. I believe they called it “loose” circumcisions. You ARE circumcised, but you're head doesn't show unless you are fully erect. It's better to do it before puberty, never on babies!

Anonymous said...

Peggy Sue, I'll take circumcision advice from someone who actually has a penis thanks. A woman's opinion on this subject means nothing. After all, men have no say when it comes to women and their abortions.

Anonymous said...

I love how bigots go around claiming or insinuating that others are racist and then, in the same breath, turn around and slam an entire race. Anonymous #1/3 is also a homophobe. Charming.

Spencer said...

Let us drool over him in peace, anon. Go whine somewhere else. If you're so against this 'blog' then why the fuck are you here?

das buut said...

Circumcision is wrong unless the person asks for it. Like with all body mods, it should only be done upon request.

That said, I think our boy here is uncut. A lotta uncut guys are pulling it back for photoshoots, I've noticed. My tumblr dashboard is full of them.

I need more time to study him. He can say the nigeria as much as he wants while I examine him.

mjbthird said...

Das buut, Gregg is Jewish so he is cut.

Craig Buntin said...

I think it's hot to see the outline of Gregg's circumcised penis.

I love it when we can find out whether a celeb is cut just by looking at his underwear.

Kudos to Gregg for doing this!

Remington said...

I've never understood the whole, "He's Jewish so he's cut!" argument. It's not just Jewish guys that get circumcised, thankfully. They're just the ones that have a big ceremony about it, for whatever reason. I'm just surprised that he looks cut since he's freaking British. Since when do Europeans get cut? Lol!

Anonymous said...

There are several problems with circumcision.
Firstly it's not just a flap of skin but a part of the penis that have a very large number of nerve cells. Secondly when a male baby is born it is fused to the glans - to circumcise a baby you essentially have to rip the skin off - like tearing a fingernail. Thirdly its done with little pain relief as it's dangerous to dope out a newborn baby. Fourthly How much skin do you take.. it's a tiny organ with No relation to how large it will grow when an adult. Often too much skin is taken causing additional problems. Fifthly the culture of circumcision in the US was started by doctors terrified of little boys playing with themselves - look up the hysteria of masturbation and you will learn a lot.. this hysteria has never dies down.
Sixth - If a parent was to ask for a doctor to remove a child's ears.. or little toes.. the doctor would refuse.. But ask a doctor to remove a foreskin and they have no problem. It's a baby.. Let the kid decide when they are old enough.
And lastly - it is illegal to circumcise a girl.. not even a prick with a needle down there.. But when it's a boy being circumcised there is harly a mention..

Anonymous said...

It's often very difficult to judge whether a person is cut or not just by glancing at their outline. It really depends on how thick the foreskin is to outline the edge of the glans.
As a gay man in a country that rarely circumcises I see a lot of foreskins on my lovers.. and the variation of them is as varied as the length and thickness of the penis..

Martin K. said...

Our jewish British pediatrician refused to nip our son and told us that if we got it done by someone else, he would not take us on as patients. Told us that it IS painful to the child and causes stress, that the child has to be strapped to a board and that the kid will scream. I am of the generation that was cut routinely. When my s on started dating he asked me about why his penis was different from his friends'. We had goog talk about the sensitivity of the glans and sexual pleasure, hygeine and general pride in having a complete and unadulterated penis. He is 30 now and seems happy with our decision.

Anonymous said...

The comments about the foreskin being useful and full of billions of sensitive nerve endings is not factually relevant. ONLY males circumcised as adults, with the same amount of mucosal membrane left, as is seen in infants circumcised at birth, can tell anyone what the effect of circumcision is. It's especially silly when women chime in.
Every properly conducted study of men circumcised as adults shows there is a neutral to a slightly positive effect. The medical evidence supports newborn circumcisions. Doing it later is more costly and carries more complications. Still, it is not as painful as the old-wives tales suggest.

The argument that adult men should have the choice is silly because why would a man who has been told it is a terrible ordeal to be circumcised as an adult, voluntarily do it, because he is unlikely to be able to easily find the evidence that it is not as bad as he has heard? Every male I have spoken to who was circumcised as an adult, myself included, would never want to go back to the 'natural' state.

Anonymous said...

Not all Jews get circumcised, I am Jewish and uncut.

Anonymous said...

It's a big nothing, and matters not either way. Hence the phony controversy. Do it if you want to, don't do it if you don't want to. The pluses/minuses are evened out. I realise this is the most disturbing position for either side, hence the hyper-emotionality you see for or against it. I often wonder, if anyone getting too excited about either position doesn't have real psychological issues to contend with. I repeat: it simply does not matter.

Catch Twenty-Two said...

"I often wonder, if anyone getting too excited about either position doesn't have real psychological issues to contend with. I repeat: it simply does not matter."

It matters to the person (or at least should) that the foreskin is attached too.... If it is NOT your penis/foreskin it is NOT for you to decide if it is butchered.

Think about this IF the mutilation goes drastically bad (even the "good" ones are mutilation) Who has to deal with it? You? Nope.. The alleged "doctor" and/or pedo mohel? Nope.. The ONLY person that has to deal with it is, the one it was attached too. Search for David Reimer if his alleged parents had PROTECTED him, loved him unconditionally he would still be alive.

Anonymous said...

I got circumcised when I was 21 and knowing now how much more enjoyable sex is with my banana peeled makes me laugh at the anti-circ brigade that spread all the rubbish scaremongering. My only regret is that I didn't get myself done sooner and when the hot weather kicks in, you REALLY appreciate not having a thermos over your head. Mutilation is another idiotic term. We remove tonsils because they do nothing useful, your appendix has no function except sit inside you like a ticking time bomb and if it decides to pop it has to be ripped out as a medical emergency or you're dead, yes that's right nature gave us parts of our body that can kill us if not removed. The appendix may have had some useful function eons ago when we were cavemen and the foreskin is the same, had a use once but in 2021 we are better off without it. Time to move on people. Given all the medical benefits to being done (the foreskin is a breeding ground for HPV the prime cause of cervical cancer) circumcision should be seen as a surgical vaccine. Cut if off as a baby and it's sorted. I would never ever want to go back to having my foreskin. Anyone who has not been circumcised is in no posiiton to comment. Then again there are lots of antivaxxers out there who think COVID-19 will go away by itself too so...

Anonymous said...

Ok. Who cares?