Wednesday, November 18, 2015

Are You Foreskin Or Against Skin

.
Hello, dear readers. I felt as if I should illustrate this post and grab your attention with a hint of what's, ahem, to come, so here, enjoy these pictures of the actor Gregg Sulkin in the latest issue of Flaunt magazine.  (Bless Flaunt magazine.)

These things aren't directly related, save in essence - I just have the feeling that among MNPP's readership there are a few people that appreciate the penis. Call me crazy; it's just a hunch. Well some friends of mine happen to be working on a thing relevant to your interests! It's a documentary called Pigs Without Blankets and it's on the subject of so-called "Intactivists" (stellar word), aka people fighting against male circumcision. I don't know, it seems to have worked out perfectly fine for Gregg Sulkin, but we'll see. Anyway they're looking for the last bit of funding on Kickstarter, which is where I am sending you guys today. Head over, hear their pitch - here's the video:
 .
.
And after the jump more of Sulkin making his own case...


14 comments:

Anonymous said...

This guy used to n-word on his instagram and creeped on an underage girl for years. Not that you care about racism when it comes to lusting after white peen, but I just thought you should know.

Anonymous said...

Who cares?

Anonymous said...

I mean, I feel like most people with integrity would care that some stupid white boy used the n-word for shits and giggles, but I shouldn't be surprised that readers of this 'blog' don't give a shit. Especially if it's a stupid white boy with abs.

Have fun.

Peggy Sue said...

I got the feeling that you cut a lot of extra foreskin in America in comparison to what we do in Europe. I believe they called it “loose” circumcisions. You ARE circumcised, but you're head doesn't show unless you are fully erect. It's better to do it before puberty, never on babies!

Anonymous said...

Peggy Sue, I'll take circumcision advice from someone who actually has a penis thanks. A woman's opinion on this subject means nothing. After all, men have no say when it comes to women and their abortions.

Anonymous said...

I love how bigots go around claiming or insinuating that others are racist and then, in the same breath, turn around and slam an entire race. Anonymous #1/3 is also a homophobe. Charming.

guitreehill said...

Let us drool over him in peace, anon. Go whine somewhere else. If you're so against this 'blog' then why the fuck are you here?

das buut said...

Circumcision is wrong unless the person asks for it. Like with all body mods, it should only be done upon request.

That said, I think our boy here is uncut. A lotta uncut guys are pulling it back for photoshoots, I've noticed. My tumblr dashboard is full of them.

I need more time to study him. He can say the nigeria as much as he wants while I examine him.

mjbthird said...

Das buut, Gregg is Jewish so he is cut.

Craig Buntin said...

I think it's hot to see the outline of Gregg's circumcised penis.

I love it when we can find out whether a celeb is cut just by looking at his underwear.

Kudos to Gregg for doing this!

Remington said...

I've never understood the whole, "He's Jewish so he's cut!" argument. It's not just Jewish guys that get circumcised, thankfully. They're just the ones that have a big ceremony about it, for whatever reason. I'm just surprised that he looks cut since he's freaking British. Since when do Europeans get cut? Lol!

Anonymous said...

There are several problems with circumcision.
Firstly it's not just a flap of skin but a part of the penis that have a very large number of nerve cells. Secondly when a male baby is born it is fused to the glans - to circumcise a baby you essentially have to rip the skin off - like tearing a fingernail. Thirdly its done with little pain relief as it's dangerous to dope out a newborn baby. Fourthly How much skin do you take.. it's a tiny organ with No relation to how large it will grow when an adult. Often too much skin is taken causing additional problems. Fifthly the culture of circumcision in the US was started by doctors terrified of little boys playing with themselves - look up the hysteria of masturbation and you will learn a lot.. this hysteria has never dies down.
Sixth - If a parent was to ask for a doctor to remove a child's ears.. or little toes.. the doctor would refuse.. But ask a doctor to remove a foreskin and they have no problem. It's a baby.. Let the kid decide when they are old enough.
And lastly - it is illegal to circumcise a girl.. not even a prick with a needle down there.. But when it's a boy being circumcised there is harly a mention..

Anonymous said...

It's often very difficult to judge whether a person is cut or not just by glancing at their outline. It really depends on how thick the foreskin is to outline the edge of the glans.
As a gay man in a country that rarely circumcises I see a lot of foreskins on my lovers.. and the variation of them is as varied as the length and thickness of the penis..

Martin K. said...

Our jewish British pediatrician refused to nip our son and told us that if we got it done by someone else, he would not take us on as patients. Told us that it IS painful to the child and causes stress, that the child has to be strapped to a board and that the kid will scream. I am of the generation that was cut routinely. When my s on started dating he asked me about why his penis was different from his friends'. We had goog talk about the sensitivity of the glans and sexual pleasure, hygeine and general pride in having a complete and unadulterated penis. He is 30 now and seems happy with our decision.