"The original story follows a man who manufactures dreams and nightmares for others, including for his own wife. In Kaufman’s version, Tatum plays Peekman, a wildly popular actor-director, famous for blockbuster physical comedies in which he stars with his wife Kiki (Thompson). "
So the casting makes sense with Tessa since she's playing a movie star -- and I'd say the casting of Channing makes sense when you consider that 1) this has to be a person that the otherworldly gorgeous Tessa Thompson would marry (and I don't know that you can cast a Phillip Seymour Hoffman type for that anymore -- the age of Woody Allen types romancing Mariel Heimingway is thankfully behind us) and then 2) Charlie Kaufman is probably tired of having a hard time making movies. So sure, let's hire some gorgeous movie stars, and make it a little easier. I am fine with that. Because this isn't to say Chan & Tess aren't extremely talented people! Their gorgeousness is a bonus -- heck I would've nominated Thompson for an Oscar for Hedda last year, and hell I might have voted for her to win too. And Chan's always been extremely under-appreciated as a performer. Anyway this extremely non-Kaufman-esque band of actors aside -- NEW CHARLIE KAUFMAN MOVIE ALERT!!!! Fuck yeah!!



Sorry she wasn't good in Hedda,that accent was ridiculous,eved Dame Joan Collins would have said "Too much darling"
ReplyDeleteDry up (said in my best British accent).
Deletelol I literally came to the comments to say how insanely good Tessa was in Hedda. There's no accounting for taste!
ReplyDeleteI'm happy to heart a new Kaufman is around the corner. I can't wait to be completely perplexed again.
ReplyDelete